Im banging my head against the wall now, really. Not because of drugs or anything but the way my leaders are going about in the press about the bridge. They keep pointing to the fact that in order for us to build the bridge, we have to sell our sand and airspace to Spore, and on top of that we have to look at the agreement of 1961, 1962 and 1965 that we had with them. And they keep saying we are right (re: their decision) over and over again? They even get the cabinet to reaffirm? But why?? I always get suspicious when they do that. The people asked for coffee and all the people get is plain water. How about giving us some real answers to some real issues, like how did we get to the part where we have to sell our sand and our airspace for constructing a bridge on our side of the territory..?? Or how did the situations become so impossible that the only way to go was to quit on the bridge. Or how the 1961, 1962 and 1965 Agreement managed to sneak in to become the main stumbling block? Those agreement and all their impossibilities were there for us to see and read, long before we started negotiating...so what was the deal then ? Did we have a plan? Was hope our main and only plan? Aarrrghh!!!
I hope.., no! I pray ~ they (our leaders) are missing the point by choice, meaning they chose to miss the point, for whatever reason. I hate wetting in my pant.
Release date: 23 October, 2003